Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation against Clearing House Regarding Seized Assets

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a direct warning from the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, including confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."
Matthew Preston
Matthew Preston

Lena Visser is an urban planner and writer passionate about the overlooked edges of cities, with a background in spatial design.